BigDocs: rolling the dice on big documents
A lot of business still runs on big documents.
How to get complete, exact and repeatable results from AI on big-document work, and how to measure it. Read in order, starting with the first piece.
AI governance frameworks provide a strong basis for good governance. But they have to be used well to get any benefits in practice.
22 articles
A lot of business still runs on big documents.
What a builder of AI systems noticed going through ISO 42001 Lead Auditor training, and why it matters for smaller organisations.
The patterns benchmarked on a hard case, contract review, against the one big prompt.
ISO 42001 starts with context.
Most organisations keep their words the way their systems keep transactions: one document per occasion.
Most small organisations don't need ISO 42001 certification first.
A contract, a tender or an enterprise agreement is written for a person turning pages.
ISO 42001's clause structure is inherited, not bespoke.
Give an agent a big document and a library and ask it to do a thorough review.
ISO 42001 scales to the AI system's risk and reach, not to headcount.
The most natural request in the world is "give me the contract back with your changes".
Most SMBs and NfPs don't build models; they use AI inside tools they bought.
A tidy redline is a strange thing to hand a reviewer.
Small AI vendors often copy enterprise policy language that claims coverage they can't evidence.
Every knowledge base starts with good intentions.
Clause 6.1.4 is a body-clause requirement; you can't exclude it through the Statement of Applicability.
Software teams stopped trusting "it looks right" a long time ago.
A certified AI management system proves you are governing AI.
The BigDocs series is about one kind of work: big documents, often several at once, where the business transaction rests on getting the answer exactly right.
Anyone who has shipped a system that makes decisions about people has had to answer one question before it went live: what do I say to the person this lands on?
Most people treat accreditation as a badge to display.
A readiness assessment isn't a gap checklist.